Thousands of Facebook users have joined anti-Villa groups, all prompted by the vicious rumor that Villa insulted Mesut Ozil’s religion during a fight at the end of Wednesday’s Supercopa de Espana. Villa and Ozil were both shown red cards as a result of their participation in the altercation, with video showing that Ozil was slapped in the face by Barcelona backup keeper Victor Valdes.

These groups include “I’m a Muslim & I Hate Villa” (3000 members), “All Against David Villa, that [sic] taunted Mesut Ozil and His Religion” (9500 members), “Anti David Villa” (6000 members) and “1,000,000 Football Fans Hate David Villa Because He Insulted Islam” (11000 members).

Dozens more are attracting members by the minute.

Even though the rumor has been proven to be completely untrue, media organizations continue to perpetuate the hateful and false charge against the Barcelona player. Iran’s state media outlet, the Islamic Republic News Agency, has shown extraordinarily poor judgment in running an article which includes a fake quote from the German international Ozil.

The irresponsibility of the press in this situation is tantamount to incitement. Football fans have shown themselves perfectly at ease with shouting racist insults and taunts at players–you can only imagine the scene that could ensue if Villa were to appear in a game in a Muslim-majority nation with this hateful rumor still spreading.

Let’s be very clear: at no point did Mesut Ozil ever claim that Villa insulted his religion in any way. Any statements attributed to Ozil have been proven to be false, and his own teammate (and fellow Muslim) Sami Khedira has stated unequivocally that Ozil made no such statement.

David Villa never insulted Islam. Any attempt to claim otherwise only deliberately fuels hatred from Muslims towards the Barcelona player, and these rapidly-growing Facebook hate groups are evidence of that.

Author: Renee Shah

For some reason England seems to be at the forefront of problems with Islam and some of the situations they are facing could help us here in North America to prepare for the eventuality of seeing the same conflicts over here.

First of all, there is an inquiry to check independent faith schools because of government concerns that some do not teach children how to fit in with British society.

The review will examine the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils at small religious schools. It will look at whether children are learning to distinguish right from wrong, and are being taught to respect the law.

The anouncement by Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, yesterday is thought to be a response to recent criticism of some Muslim schools, or madrassas.

A report from the right-wing think-tank Civitas claimed last month that some Muslim children were being prepared to live in Muslim enclaves, distinct from the rest of society.

This follows a campaign by two Muslim governors to give Islam a greater presence in a state school played a key part in forcing a successful Headmistress from her job, the High Court found yesterday.

Erica Connor, 57, the former head teacher of the New Monument primary school in Woking, Surrey, was forced to leave the school because of stress after she was accused of Islamophobia.

The court was told that over two years, two governors campaigned to make the school more Islamic and that their behaviour had torn apart the school's governing board.

Ms. Connor was hounded out of her job and was awarded more than £400,000 in compensation.

The Daily Mail revealed that the school's troubles started when a local mosque decided to pack the governing body with Muslims.

Paul Martin – a Muslim convert – and Mumtaz Saleem began monopolising meetings with the aim of turning New Monument in Woking into an Islamic faith school.

Mr Martin, a businessman, yesterday confirmed there had been a 'conscious effort' to increase the number of Muslims on the board.

But when Mrs Connor resisted the new governors' plans – such as the introduction of Islamic worship into the school – she became the target of a smear campaign.

An anonymous petition was circulated among parents, stating that those signing 'no longer have confidence in Erica Connor to educate our children in a way that respects and values our faith, culture and heritage'.

An accompanying document accused the headmistress of 'racism and Islamophobia'.

She eventually retired from the 300-pupil school because of illhealth in December 2006.

(Ed. note; I am not going to comment on this story but I thought it important for you to know about it.)

Forewarned is forearmed!

Allan W Janssen is the author of the book The Plain Truth About God (What the mainstream religions don't want you to know……!) and is available as an E-Book H E R E ! and as a paperback H E R E !

Visit the blog "Perspective" at http://allans-perspective.blogspot.com

Author: Allan Janssen

Author: Dan E.

A massacre in a church in Baghdad and the Oklahoma vote against Shariah law. To the average American, these two events could not possibility be connected in any way, shape or form.

Yet the attack upon Christians, not only in the church of Our Lady of Salvation in Baghdad on October 31 but also in Nigeria, Indonesia, Algeria, Egypt and elsewhere, is a form of Islamic interpretation of Shariah.

Islamic Jihad (which President Obama refused to define let alone condemn when asked about it in Mumbai recently) dictates that if an infidel refuses to convert to what jihadists perceive as the “one and only true religion,” then killing them is a virtue.

This is part of the strict Islamic interpretation of the Shariah. And it is this Shariah law that many Muslim jihadists in Europe and the United States want to see as part and parcel of court proceedings in the West.

Fair-minded Westerners may ask, “What’s wrong with that?”

Simply put, it is the camel’s nose under the tent (which is also a mode of Shariah interpretation). First, it is allowing the Shariah to be applied by judges when they are ruling in Muslim cases. This ultimately will lead to full-blown acceptance, or should I say imposition, of Shariah law upon ALL Western citizens.

Far fetched?

When Muslims invaded former Christian lands in North Africa, the jihadists said they were coming only as liberators from the bad Romans. This referred of course to the Byzantines, or the eastern part of the Roman Empire. But within a few decades, the camel that put his nose under the tent, took over the tent and today there are hardly any Christians left in that part of the world. They were methodically and systematically forced to convert or eliminated.

Islamic lobbying groups successfully found a politically correct judge to bring an injunction against the will of the Oklahoman people, who voted 70% against the use of Shariah law in their state courts.

Oklahomans saw what is happening in New Jersey and elsewhere. Judges are using the Shariah to allow Muslim men to abuse their wives (a practice that is not only permitted but encouraged in the Islamic world), and citizens of the Sooner State wanted to be pro-active. But alas, the politically correct courts (who in my opinion will help bring about the demise of Western civilization) are overruling the will of the people.

Click above to read more, including his ending: Oklahomans and citizens of every other state should not be left exposed by the federal government. Had we been so blessed to have a federal government committed to defending the rights of 98% of Americans, it would have taken the initiative to guarantee that there are no cracks in U.S. law that could lead to another Baghdad-type massacre; perhaps on American soil. The people of this great nation must be strong enough and smart enough to stop the camel from sticking its nose under our tent.

**************

These “politically correct” judges are going to be the death of us – perhaps even literally.  We must start listening to people who have lived in that part of the world to try to understand it.  We must.

By the way, if you question Youssef’s remark about Obama refusing to condemn or even define jihad, here’s the link for that video.  That part is at the beginning of the 39 minute video. Obama Interacts With Student In Mumbai

Author: Marilyn M.

“

Author: Savo Heleta

"We must believe in the fact that Islam is not confined to geographical borders, ethnic groups and nations. It's a universal ideology that leads the world to justice,"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So are we ready for him is the Question. His coming to New York City is sort of like Hitler coming to America, as both think they want to rule the world.

How many US Military have died because of Ahmadinejads actions in Iran?

Author: Richard B.

This is a great read to educate yourselves on just what Islam is all about. This is where we are going right now. It is more important to know the Muslim faith and who it was founded by and what they are really like, then having to know what the Obama’s are having for dinner. Obama is a part of this,believe it or not.    A big hat tip goes to Walter Long for his research into good sources to bring great information to us.  Thank you Walt. 

From Walt’s American Kafir.  Enjoy the read its an easy one.  Thank you, Mari ana.

The Fraud of Islam

By Amil Imani

From the primitive land of the Arabian Peninsula of over 14 centuries ago rose Muhammad, an illiterate hired hand of a rich widow Khadija, claiming he was the bearer of a perfect life prescription from God—the Quran. He claimed humanity could do no better than to follow its precepts as well as to emulate Muhammad’s own life example for a guarantee of bliss and salvation. In exchange for this, people had to embrace Islam—surrender—by surrendering their liberty to Muhammad.

Islam is the most successful fraud in the history of humanity and it is a great success. Millions of mullahs and imams keep the fraud going and over a billion and a half of the faithful pay for it. They pay in funds, labor and even life, for the IOUs issued to them by the Islamic organizations that glide through life without breaking a sweat for earning their daily bread. Islam is a fraud and Muslims are the victims.

Muhammad, during his Mecca years, was ridiculed for his confused sayings by his own tribe of Quraish. He was called “shaeron majnoon”—crazed poet.

The death of his first wife and wealthy employer Khadija left Muhammad even more vulnerable to the ridicule and harassment of the Meccans. He fled from Mecca to Medina and in the relative safety of that city with a large tolerant Jewish community, Muhammad found more people willing to join his clique.

Once in Medina, Muhammad hit on a most powerful formula for success. He justified everything by claiming that Allah wanted it this way. And Allah was nothing to trifle with. He held the key to the most magnificent paradise as well as to a dreadful hell. The duty of every good Muslim became unquestioning obedience to everything that Muhammad said and wished. Muhammad became Allah’s gatekeeper to paradise and hell.

Muhammad’s formula worked magic with the Bedouins of Arabia who thrived on robbery and killing. His religion spread like a pandemic disease in no time at all.

As Muhammad gathered more and more followers, he turned on the Jewish community of Medina, killed the men, plundered their belongings, and captured their women and children as slaves. That was the birth of “Jihad.” Be meek and deceptive first, until you gather enough power then unsheathe the sword. It worked then and it is working today.

In no time at all, the savages of Arabia, allured by the win-win promise of Muhammad—you kill you get the booty from your victims in this world—you get killed and your abode will be the unimaginably glorious sensuous paradise of Allah—sword-in-hand, sallied forth to lands near and far.

Mind Control

As humans, our two legs move us along, but it is our minds that tell us which path to take in life and what to do. As the mind commands so goes the person. Yet, for humans, the mind does not arrive in this world with a set program of instructions. Contrary to many beliefs, we are born neither as demons nor as angels. Within each one of us is a potential for a demon or an angel. Many evolve into a mix of the two, a few fortunate mature into truly angelic and some become personifications of evil. It is the mind’s program that plays the critical role in making us what we are

Islam, from its inception, discovered the crucial secret of getting to the young mind early by adhering to the dictum: Instruction in early childhood is akin to carving in a rock. In the same vein goes the Jesuit saying, “Give me a child until he is seven, and I will give you the man,” derived from the philosophy and theology of Saint Augustine. The immense importance of getting early to the young mind is also emphasized by non-religious doctrines as diverse as the Freudian psychoanalytic theory and Watsonian Behaviorist psychology.

Islam Apologists

And here we are in the 21st century facing the onslaught of the Islamists, jihadist and Islam apologists in our culture and way of life. These are the fruits of the tree of fraud, planted by Muhammad some 1400 years ago.

Self-described doctors of Islamic religion universally practice sugarcoating the fraud of Islam. They keep ranting about the importance of accepting things on faith, denigrate reason, dangle carrots and sticks, and demand unconditional surrender in return for guaranteed bliss and salvation. The masses toe the line, support the clergy’s lavish parasitic lifestyle and the charade continues. It works like a charm. Use the Jihad of the sword when it can and use the “Soft Jihad” until the sword can be unsheathed to finish the job. And don’t forget, the end justifies any and all means, Islam apologists keep on preaching to the hordes.

Islam apologists never present the naked face of Islam. They never speak of the Islam that thrives on hate, throws acid in the face of women who fail to don the hijab or girls going to school; flogging people for sporting non-Islamic haircuts, stoning to death, violators of sexual norms and other forms of Islamic brutalities such as honor killing. They never talk about institutionalized pedophilia in Islam.

The prophet Muhammad “married” a six-year old child and consummated the marriage when Ayesha was only nine, when he himself was pushing sixty. When apologists are confronted with this repulsive behavior of the founder of their “perfect religion,” a few exercise the defense mechanism of denial and say it did not happen, dismissing their own most trusted historical record. Some say that it wasn’t exactly marriage. It was a politically expedient act, an act of the perfect emissary of Allah. Then we have numerous instances of the same child molestation happening in the Islamic world ever since the example set by Muhammad. It is a kind of marriage of pre-pubescent girls to older men. It was not long ago, Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, issued a fatwa proclaiming that there is no minimum age for marriage, and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.”

Adding insult to injury, Islam has powerful and unwitting allies in the masses of good-hearted gullible Americans who bend over backwards to protect the long cherished principle of religious freedom. And it is this magnificent provision of our society that made Hillary Clinton, for example, reissue a visa to the likes of Tariq Ramadan who come to exploit the benign provisions of a benevolent system for establishing Islamic enslavement.

Political Islam

Islam is political to the core. In Islam the mosque and State are one and the same—the mosque is the State. This arrangement goes back to the days of Muhammad himself. Islam is also radical in the extreme. Even the “moderate” Islam is radical in its beliefs as well as its deeds. Muslims believe that all non-Muslims, bar none, are hellfire bound and well deserve being maltreated compared to believers.

A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in liberty. Everything is up to Allah, so says Mohammad. Everything that a Muslim does is contingent upon the will and decree of Allah. It is for this reason that the phrase Enshallah (Allah willing) always accompanies any promise or commitment that a believer makes. By embracing Muhammad as the unerring and eternal emissary of Allah, a Muslim surrenders his liberty to decide for himself.

Muslims and Liberty

A Muslim’s surrender of liberty is not merely a matter of personal choice. Muslims abandon their most precious rights and are out to make all non-Muslims also do so, by hook or crook. It is said that misery loves company. And the type of misery that the fraud of Islam has visited on Muslims and the Islamic lands is a rapidly spreading plague that must be resisted by all who cherish their God-given liberty.

In spite of massive propaganda by Islamic organizations, more and more people are beginning to recognize Islam for what it is: A Fraud.

I challenge all cultural Muslims or any other kind of Muslim who is not a jihadist, to courageously do what is right, and take that fateful step; inhale the life-nurturing fragrance of freedom, abandon the fraud of Islam altogether and enlist in the ranks of the free where all members of the human tribe can live in peace and harmony.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Amil Imani is an Iranian-American writer, poet, satirist, novelist, essayist, literary translator, public speaker and political analyst who has been writing and speaking out about the danger of radical Islam both in America and internationally. He has become a formidable voice in the United States against the danger of global jihad and Islamization of America. He maintains a website at www.amilimani.com. Imani is the author of the riveting book Obama Meets Ahmadinejad and the thriller Operation Persian Gulf.

Author: maree b.

Conservatives started the angry debate on whether a Muslim Center is way too offensive near Ground Zero, so accusing all of Islam to be guilty of 3,000 dead Americans (some of them Muslims, by the way).

Conservatives have been repeating over and over that Obama is a Muslim, and it’s been a part of their derogatory name calling of him.

We are at war in 3 Muslim countries now, but officially not at war with Islam.  How can our troops tell them we are on their side, and only fighting terrorists, not Islam, if this is going on here at home.  They hear us, believe me.  America is once again making itself famous for speaking with a forked tongue.

They use to say loose lips sink ships.

I wonder what the slogan would be today for how our name calling is making it hard on our troops to win hearts and minds.

And a Christian Church plans a very public Koran burning.  That won’t upset Muslims?

http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978455421

Author: Peter Joseph Swanson

The 38-year-old engineer and politician flashed wide smiles and took foreign reporters on a tour showing the prevalence of support for his father’s regime. Amidst the hand shaking and laughter, Seif al-Islam displayed the V for victory hand sign (not to be mistaken with the peace symbol). The photographs portray the event to look like a campaign.

Seif al-Islam told an AP reporter:

We are here. This is our country. This is our people, and we live here, and we die here… And we are going to win, because the people are with us. That’s why we are going to win. Look at them—look at them, in the streets, everywhere!

Picture Credit: AP/Dario Lopez-Mills

This news combats the recent wave of positive developments coming from the rebel and NATO forces in Libya. Seif al-Islam looked far from being a prisoner; he appeared comfortable and calm.

This development is a rare bright spot for Gadhafi’s party. Hopes for loyalists momentarily increased this morning, a revitalized opponent for the rebels would mean more American dollars spent in its bombing campaign and bad news for the Obama administration.

Since this morning, rebel forces entered Muammar Gadhafi’s complex and have turned their search to the elder Gadhafi. Does the next generation of Gadhafi pose a threat to rebel forces in the immediate? Probably not. The regime as a whole looks weakened, and the rebels eagerly seek victory. However, the charisma that Seif showed this morning could pose threats to the rebuilding of Libya. Wars cannot destroy ideas, and loyalties certainly threaten to undermine a new political landscape in Libya.

Author: Jay Russell

Having worked for the Saudi royal family, Minoru Yamasaki, the Japanese-American architect who designed the World Trade Center, was deeply influenced by Islamic design.  Yamasaki put design elements found in Mecca into many of his projects, including the World Trade Center.

Author: Peter Joseph Swanson